Subaru Outback 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 260 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 350 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.9 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Subaru Outback equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is larger, but lower. Subaru Outback is 16 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Outback has 24 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. This could mean that the Subaru Outback uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`979 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |