Subaru Outback 2017 vs Mazda 6 2018

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Subaru Outback
2017 -
Mazda 6
2018 -
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Subaru Outback is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Subaru Outback is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol)2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 175 - 260 HP145 - 250 HP
Torque: 235 - 350 NM213 - 445 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 - 10.2 seconds7.8 - 10.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 9.94.4 - 9.0
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.88 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.68 m1.45 m
Subaru Outback is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 23 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 512 litres489 litres
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Outback has 23 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`115~ 2`066
Safety:
Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 26 40024 800
Pros and Cons: Subaru Outback has
  • automatic transmission only
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Mazda 6 has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv