Subaru Outback 2017 vs Mazda 6 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 6 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Subaru Outback is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 6 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 - 260 HP | 145 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 350 NM | 213 - 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10.2 seconds | 7.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| In general, Subaru Outback are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda 6. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.9 | 4.4 - 9.0 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 221 mm (7.9 - 8.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.45 m | |
| Subaru Outback is 6 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Outback is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2076 litres | no data | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`115 kg | ~ 2`066 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`679 kg | ~ 1`509 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 436 kg | ~ 557 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Mazda 6. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Outback scores higher in safety tests. The Subaru Outback scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |