Subaru Outback 2017 vs Skoda Superb 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subaru Outback is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Skoda Superb has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Subaru Outback is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Superb can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Skoda Superb also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 - 260 HP | 120 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 - 350 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 10.2 seconds | 5.3 - 11.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.9 | 1.9 - 9.7 | |
|
Subaru Outback petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Superb. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 221 mm (7.9 - 8.7 inches) | 136 - 150 mm (5.4 - 5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Subaru Outback can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 512 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2076 litres | 2081 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 148 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 5 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`115 kg | ~ 2`216 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`679 kg | ~ 1`539 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 436 kg | ~ 677 kg | |
| Subaru Outback load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 55 procentiem less than Skoda Superb. Therefore, Skoda Superb is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |