Subaru Legacy 1999 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Legacy engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, but torque is 1 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Subaru Legacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Legacy consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Legacy could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Legacy consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Impreza | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Picnic, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Legacy is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Legacy is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Subaru Legacy has 15 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. This could mean that the Subaru Legacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Legacy is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Subaru Legacy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Legacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 330 percent more cases than Subaru Legacy, so Subaru Legacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Legacy has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |