Subaru Legacy 2003 vs Subaru Outback 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 165 HP | 209 HP | |
Torque: | 226 NM | 282 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Legacy engine produces 44 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Subaru Legacy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
The Subaru Legacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Legacy consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Subaru Legacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Legacy consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.72 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.58 m | |
Subaru Legacy and Subaru Outback are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 464 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1649 litres | no data | |
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Subaru Legacy has 35 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Legacy has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |