Subaru Legacy 2003 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Subaru Legacy is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 138 - 245 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 - 297 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 11.7 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
|
Subaru Legacy petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Subaru Legacy is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Legacy is 7 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Legacy is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 433 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Kia Optima has more luggage space. Subaru Legacy has 46 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Legacy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Subaru Legacy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`948 | ~ 1`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Legacy has
|
Kia Optima has
| |