Subaru Impreza 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Subaru Impreza engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is larger. Subaru Impreza is 58 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 353 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1266 litres | 992 litres | |
|
Subaru Impreza has more luggage capacity. Subaru Impreza has 108 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Impreza (by 274 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 1`567 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`440 kg | 1`013 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 360 kg | 554 kg | |
| Subaru Impreza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Peugeot 206. Therefore, Peugeot 206 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |