Subaru Impreza 2006 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Impreza engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Impreza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.32 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |