Subaru Impreza 2006 vs Nissan Note 2009
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Impreza engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Nissan Note. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Note might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Note 2009 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is larger, but lower. Subaru Impreza is 36 cm longer than the Nissan Note, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Subaru Impreza has more luggage capacity. Subaru Impreza has 76 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Nissan Note has
| |