Subaru Impreza 2006 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Subaru Impreza
2006 - 2007
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 142 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds12.2 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Impreza and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Subaru Impreza torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 3. Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.96.3
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 240 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
710 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years16 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.46 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.48 m1.47 m
Subaru Impreza and Mazda 3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 356 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Subaru Impreza has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`770
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 24004200
Pros and Cons: Subaru Impreza has
  • timing belt engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv