Subaru Impreza 1997 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Impreza engine produces 61 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 98 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 430 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.69 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 14 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 363 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Impreza has 37 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Impreza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Impreza has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |