Subaru Impreza 1998 vs Toyota Celica 1995
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Impreza engine produces 117 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Subaru Impreza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Impreza consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Subaru Impreza over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is smaller, but higher. Subaru Impreza is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 353 litres | 208 litres | |
|
Subaru Impreza has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Celica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`680 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`005 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 395 kg | |
| Subaru Impreza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Toyota Celica. Therefore, Subaru Impreza is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |