Subaru Impreza 2003 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 225 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Impreza engine produces 82 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 128 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 460 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 290'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.32 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Impreza is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |