Subaru Impreza 2003 vs Toyota Celica 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Impreza engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 12 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Impreza consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Impreza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.32 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 8 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Impreza is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |