Subaru Impreza 2003 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Subaru Impreza
2003 - 2005
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 125 HP150 HP
Torque: 184 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds9 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Impreza engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.68.2
Subaru Impreza consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway870 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru LegacyInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Mazda 3 2006 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.49 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Impreza is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 42002600
Pros and Cons: Subaru Impreza has
  • timing belt engine
  • has 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv