Subaru Impreza 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Subaru Impreza
2006 - 2007
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 105 HP105 HP
Torque: 142 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.5 seconds12.5 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Impreza and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Subaru Impreza torque is 3 NM less than Mazda 3. Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.17.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway880 km on highway
620 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years16 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mazda 3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ...  More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.49 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Impreza is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 401 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight: 1`750 kg1`730 kg
Net weight:1`300 kg1`200 kg
Load capacity:450 kg530 kg
Subaru Impreza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 58002000
Pros and Cons: Subaru Impreza has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • hydraulic power steering
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • electric power steering
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv