Subaru Impreza 2008 vs Mazda 3 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Impreza engine produces 3 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Impreza is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
538 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |