Subaru Impreza 2017 vs Jaguar XE 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Impreza engine produces 120 HP more power than Jaguar XE, but torque is 23 NM less than Jaguar XE. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 6.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 930 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 5.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XE engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar XE engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Subaru Impreza is smaller, but higher. Subaru Impreza is 8 cm shorter than the Jaguar XE, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 455 litres | |
| Subaru Impreza has 5 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.66 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.66 metres less than that of the Jaguar XE, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`235 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Impreza is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |