Subaru Impreza 2017 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 268 HP | 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Impreza engine produces 82 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 5.7 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Impreza consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Mazda 3 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Impreza is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Impreza is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1138 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`959 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`576 kg | 1`394 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 424 kg | 565 kg | |
| Subaru Impreza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 27 600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |