Subaru Impreza 2000 vs Volkswagen Bora 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Subaru Impreza is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Bora can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Bora also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 - 218 HP | 100 - 204 HP | |
Torque: | 143 - 292 NM | 145 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 15.9 seconds | 7.6 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.2 | 5.2 - 11.0 | |
Subaru Impreza petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Bora. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
Subaru Impreza is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Impreza is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Bora, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`881 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Volkswagen Bora has
| |