Subaru Impreza 1997 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota RAV4 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 211 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 - 290 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 14.1 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.2 | 7.1 - 9.3 | |
|
Subaru Impreza petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Impreza is 15 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 363 litres | 678 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Impreza uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`703 kg | ~ 1`833 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`172 kg | ~ 1`357 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 531 kg | ~ 476 kg | |
| Subaru Impreza load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Subaru Impreza is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Impreza has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |