Subaru Forester 1997 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 3 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.8 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.74 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 25 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |