Subaru Forester 1997 vs Opel Frontera 1998

 
Subaru Forester
1997 - 2000
Opel Frontera
1998 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 125 HP205 HP
Torque: 184 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 seconds10.7 seconds
Opel Frontera is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Forester engine produces 80 HP less power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Opel Frontera. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.013.2
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Subaru Forester consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway710 km on highway
Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km470'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Frontera engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru LegacyUsed also on Isuzu Rodeo
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.45 m4.66 m
Width: 1.74 m1.79 m
Height: 1.60 m1.74 m
Subaru Forester is smaller.
Subaru Forester is 21 cm shorter than the Opel Frontera, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 14 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data389 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1790 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.7 metres less than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`450
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Subaru Forester has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 295 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18002400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Frontera has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv