Subaru Forester 1997 vs Ford Maverick 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 7 NM less than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 12.3 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 21 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
| |