Subaru Forester 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 53 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Forester consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.76 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |