Subaru Forester 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 56 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 30 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |