Subaru Forester 2000 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Forester consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.76 m | |
| Subaru Forester and Ford Maverick are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
| |