Subaru Forester 2000 vs Subaru Outback 2002
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 223 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Outback is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 31 HP less power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Subaru Outback. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.58 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 27 cm shorter than the Subaru Outback, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |