Subaru Forester 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 2 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 8 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |