Subaru Forester 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 68 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 119 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |