Subaru Forester 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 65 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| 500 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |