Subaru Forester 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 210 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 48 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.1 | |
| Subaru Forester consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 9 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |