Subaru Forester 2002 vs Kia Sportage 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 30 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.8 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.65 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 14 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 373 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
| |