Subaru Forester 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.76 m | |
| Subaru Forester and Ford Maverick are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |