Subaru Forester 2002 vs Subaru Forester 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester 2002 engine produces 33 HP less power than Subaru Forester 2005, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester 2005. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester 2002 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2005, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 2002 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester 2005 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2002 is 3 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 387 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |