Subaru Forester 2002 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 22 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.6 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Jeep Cherokee 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 5 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |