Subaru Forester 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 68 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.1 | |
| Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1525 litres | 952 litres | |
| Subaru Forester has 138 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 573 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`455 kg | 1`505 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 405 kg | |
| Subaru Forester load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem more than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Subaru Forester is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |