Subaru Forester 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 2 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 214 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 368 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |