Subaru Forester 2005 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester and Jeep Cherokee have the same engine power, but Subaru Forester torque is 214 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.9 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`688 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |