Subaru Forester 2005 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester engine produces 8 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 14 NM less than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Subaru Forester 2005 2.0 engine: The Subaru EJ204 is a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter boxer engine producing around 150–160 hp, widely used in models such as Impreza, Legacy, and Forester between 1999 and 2015. It is generally regarded as a durable engine, but like many units from the EJ ... More about Subaru Forester 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.76 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 4 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1525 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`978 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |