Subaru Forester 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 172 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 6 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 4 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`015 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |