Subaru Forester 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 6 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 755 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 305 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |