Subaru Forester 2008 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 7 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1691 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 91 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |