Subaru Forester 2008 vs Mazda CX-7 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-7 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 110 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 184 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Subaru Forester 2008 2.0 engine: The Subaru EJ204 is a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter boxer engine producing around 150–160 hp, widely used in models such as Impreza, Legacy, and Forester between 1999 and 2015. It is generally regarded as a durable engine, but like many units from the EJ ... More about Subaru Forester 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but higher. Subaru Forester is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 774 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`015 kg | 2`301 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |