Subaru Forester 2008 vs Dodge Nitro 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Subaru Forester) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Dodge Nitro) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Dodge Nitro is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 27 HP less power than Dodge Nitro, whereas torque is 264 NM less than Dodge Nitro. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Nitro, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Nitro. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Nitro engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Dodge Nitro engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Nitro, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1994 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Subaru Forester has 81 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Nitro. The Dodge Nitro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dodge Nitro, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Dodge Nitro has
| |