Subaru Forester 2011 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 16 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 99 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Subaru Forester consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Forester could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Subaru Forester consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller. Subaru Forester is 11 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Captiva, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1577 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Captiva has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 27 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 1.7 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester scores higher in safety tests, but Chevrolet Captiva is better rated in child safety tests. The Subaru Forester scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Captiva has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Chevrolet Captiva has
| |