Subaru Forester 2011 vs Subaru Forester 2008

 
Subaru Forester
2011 - 2013
Subaru Forester
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 198 NM196 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.4 seconds12.7 seconds
Subaru Forester 2011 is more dynamic to drive.
Subaru Forester 2011 and Subaru Forester 2008 have the same engine power, but Subaru Forester 2011 torque is 2 NM more than Subaru Forester 2008. Subaru Forester 2011 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.58.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km10.6 l/100km
The Subaru Forester 2011 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Forester 2011 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2008, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester 2011 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Forester 2011 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester 2008.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1010 km on highway920 km on highway
640 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Subaru Forester 2011 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 16 years16 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.56 m
Width: 1.78 m1.78 m
Height: 1.70 m1.70 m
Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester 2011 and Subaru Forester 2008 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres450 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0152`015
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 62004200
Pros and Cons: Subaru Forester has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Subaru Forester has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv