Subaru Forester 2011 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.8 | |
| Subaru Forester consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is smaller, but slightly higher. Subaru Forester is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 986 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has more luggage space. Subaru Forester has 141 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Subaru Forester is better rated in child safety tests. The Mitsubishi Outlander scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |