Subaru Forester 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 179 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Subaru Forester engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 2 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 3 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`087 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Subaru Forester has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Subaru Forester quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 12 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |