Subaru Forester 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Forester and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, but Subaru Forester torque is 2 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Subaru Forester reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.3 | |
| Subaru Forester consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Subaru Forester over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Subaru Forester is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1577 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Subaru Forester can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |